Pro-democracy activists say China’s new security laws are ‘the end of Hong Kong’ as we know it

Pro-democracy activists say China’s new security laws are ‘the end of Hong Kong’ as we know it


China passed a sweeping national security law for Hong Kong on Tuesday, a historic move that critics and many western governments fear will smother the finance hub’s freedoms and hollow out its autonomy.

The legislation was unanimously approved by China’s rubber-stamp parliament on Tuesday morning, little more than six weeks after it was first unveiled, sending shockwaves through semi-autonomous Hong Kong and beyond.

“It marks the end of Hong Kong that the world knew before,” prominent democracy campaigner Joshua Wong tweeted as his political party Demosisto announced it was disbanding. 

“With sweeping powers and ill-defined law, the city will turn into a #secretpolicestate.”

The United States, Britain, the European Union and the United Nations rights watchdog have all voiced fears the law could be used to stifle criticism of Beijing, which wields similar laws on the authoritarian mainland to crush dissent. 

In an unprecedented decision, the law bypassed Hong Kong’s fractious legislature and the wording was kept secret from the city’s 7.5 million inhabitants.

“The national security law for Hong Kong was officially passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee today,” the DAB, Hong Kong’s largest pro-Beijing party, said in a statement on Tuesday welcoming the law.

A protester gestures during a rally in Hong Kong.

A protester gestures during a rally in Hong Kong.

Getty

There was no formal announcement from Beijing on the passage of the law. Instead the news filtered out via pro-Beijing politicians and local media outlets in Hong Kong.

“We haven’t seen the details… but all Hong Kong delegates firmly support the law,” Henry Tang, leader of a group of pro-establishment Hong Kong figures invited to a meeting at Beijing’s Liaison Office Tuesday afternoon, told reporters.

But Beijing’s opacity has infuriated others. 

“The fact that Hong Kong people will only come to know what’s really in this new law after the fact is more than preposterous,” Claudia Mo, an opposition lawmaker, told AFP.

Wen Wei Po and Ta Kung Pao – two Hong Kong newspapers that serve as conduits for Beijing’s official policy – also confirmed the passing of the law, as did multiple local Hong Kong media outlets citing anonymous sources in Beijing. 

Even as word filtered out that the law had been approved, Hong Kongers remained in the dark about its contents and what might now constitute a crime. 

At her weekly press conference on Tuesday morning, Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam – a pro-Beijing appointee – declined to comment on whether the law had been passed or what it contained. 

“I think at this moment, it is not appropriate for me to comment on any questions related to the national security law,” she told reporters.

‘End of Hong Kong’

As part of the 1997 handover from Britain, Hong Kong was guaranteed certain freedoms – as well as judicial and legislative autonomy – for 50 years in a deal known as “One Country, Two Systems”.

The formula formed the bedrock of the city’s transformation into a world class business hub, bolstered by a reliable judiciary and political freedoms unseen on the mainland. 

Critics have long accused Beijing of chipping away at that status, but they describe the security law as the most brazen move yet.

A summary of the law published by the official state agency Xinhua this month said the legislation would cover subversion, secession, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces. 

China’s security agencies will be able to set up shop publicly in the city for the first time.  

And Beijing will have jurisdiction over some cases, toppling the legal firewall that has existed between Hong Kong and the mainland’s party-controlled courts. 

Analysts said that even without details the security law radically restructures the relationship between Beijing and Hong Kong. 

“It’s a fundamental change that dramatically undermines both the local and international community’s confidence towards Hong Kong’s “One Country, Two Systems” model and its status as a robust financial centre,” Hong Kong political analyst Dixon Sing told AFP.

On the mainland, national security laws are routinely used to jail critics, especially for the vague offence of “subversion”.

Beijing and Hong Kong’s government reject those allegations. 

They have said the laws will only target a minority of people, will not harm political freedoms in the city and will restore business confidence after a year of historic pro-democracy protests. 

Millions took to the streets last year while a smaller hard core of protesters frequently battled police in often violent confrontations that saw more than 9,000 arrested.

Hong Kong banned protests in recent months, citing previous unrest and the coronavirus pandemic, although local transmissions have ended.

Some western nations warned of potential repercussions ahead of the security law’s passing. 

However many are also wary of incurring Beijing’s wrath and losing lucrative access to the mainland’s huge economy.

“We deplore this decision,” European Council head Charles Michel told a press conference Tuesday.

“This law risks seriously undermining the high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong,” Michel said in comments repeated by European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen.

Chris Patten, the last British governor of the territory, said in a statement that the decision marked “the end of one-country, two-systems.” 

Washington – which has embarked on a trade war with China – has said the security law means Hong Kong no longer enjoys sufficient autonomy from the mainland to justify special status. 

In a largely symbolic move, the United States on Monday ended sensitive defence exports to Hong Kong over the law.

China said it would take unspecified “countermeasures” in response.

Britain had said it was willing to provide a “pathway to citizenship” for millions of Hong Kongers if the security law went ahead.



Source link

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Menu